Establishing the real estate AI governance standard, with the institutions it will measure.
AIGX Real Estate v1.0 is currently in development. AIGX Research is convening four organizations for a comprehensive governance assessment of one production AI system, at no cost, with the findings informing the control set, evidence requirements and critical-gate thresholds prior to publication.
No ratings have been issued under AIGX Real Estate. That is the purpose of this cohort. The framework’s first ratings should be defensible precisely because the organizations to which they will apply helped establish what constitutes acceptable evidence.
The boundary of this engagement, stated in full.
Assurance predicated on ambiguity has no value. The scope is therefore defined explicitly at the outset, in both directions.
| In scope | Out of scope |
|---|---|
| A comprehensive control-to-obligation mapping for one AI system currently in operation | An issued AIGX rating. None have been issued, and none will be prior to publication of v1.0 |
| Gate analysis identifying the findings that would constrain a rating under present conditions | Certification, audit opinion or regulatory clearance of any description |
| A documented remediation roadmap specifying owners, artifacts and sequence | A software evaluation. The platform is not the subject of this engagement |
| A framework review session in which participant objections are incorporated | A commercial process presented in the form of an assessment |
What each party contributes.
Participation carries no fee. It does carry a cost: the sustained attention of your governance owners. We ask that this be assessed candidly at the outset rather than reconsidered mid-engagement.
Assessment deliverable
One system assessed against draft AIGX Real Estate v1.0, delivered as a gate report suitable for board and procurement review.
Framework input
Direct input into the controls, thresholds and critical-gate definitions applied across the sector following publication.
Queue position
Priority within the issuance queue upon release of AIGX Real Estate v1.0, together with named founding-partner attribution on the published framework, or full anonymity at the participant’s discretion.
Participant commitment
Evidence access under non-disclosure agreement; named accountable owners in leasing or property operations, data privacy, PropTech and engineering; and approximately 12 to 16 hours of their time across six weeks.
Four places, disclosed publicly.
The ledger below reflects the current state of the cohort and is updated as places are allocated. An accurate empty row is preferable to an implied level of demand.
| Place | Organization | System | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP-01 | Reserved — multi-family property operator | Tenant screening · high risk class | Held |
| FP-02 | Under review — PropTech decisioning vendor | Applicant decisioning · scoping complete | In review |
| FP-03 | Open | Preference: investment or valuation AI | Open |
| FP-04 | Open | Preference: smart-building or property operations AI | Open |
Allocation basis
Places are allocated on the basis of system diversity rather than order of application. A cohort comprising four comparable systems would yield a framework applicable only to comparable systems.
Six weeks from scoping to gate report.
The sequence is ordered because each stage depends on its predecessor. Timings are indicative and follow the availability of participant evidence owners.
Scoping
Working session to agree the system in scope, its risk classification and the accountable owners. Either party may withdraw without cost.
Evidence request
The participant receives the draft control set and the artifact required against each requirement. Absent artifacts are recorded as absent.
Mapping and review
Each artifact is mapped to its obligation and assigned validated, in review or blocker. Contested determinations are recorded, not resolved unilaterally.
Gate report
Domain scores, open critical gates and the remediation roadmap, designated clearly as an assessment rather than a rating.
Framework review
Working session on the framework’s deficiencies: unmeasurable controls, gates at inappropriate severity, evidence real estate operators and PropTech vendors do not hold.
Suitability for the founding cohort.
The determining factor is whether a system exists in production and an accountable owner can be identified.
| Suitable where | Not suitable where |
|---|---|
| The organization operates at least one AI system in leasing, investment, valuation, property operations or active pre-deployment, or in active pre-deployment | A certificate, seal or attestation is required against a fixed deadline |
| A procurement, board or regulatory discussion concerning that system is already scheduled | The system is a prototype without an accountable owner or a defined production path |
| Accountable owners for tenant/applicant decisioning, privacy, vendor governance and monitoring can be identified at the point of application | Evidence access requires an approval chain exceeding six weeks |
| The organization accepts that findings will be recorded as blockers rather than moderated | The objective is a favorable determination rather than an accurate one |
Submit one system for consideration.
An application should identify the system, its risk classification as the organization understands it, and the individual accountable for its tenant, applicant, valuation or property-operational impact. AIGX Research responds within three working days in all cases, including where an application is declined.
Submit an applicationNotice
© 2026 AIGX Research Inc. The founding partner program delivers a governance assessment and does not constitute an issued rating. AIGX Real Estate v1.0 remains in draft and no ratings have been issued under it. Nothing on this page constitutes legal, regulatory, real estate, financial or investment advice.